Wikipedia pages change. Edits, vandalism, deletion nominations and community discussions can affect your article at any time. Maintenance plans provide structured monitoring and response so issues are caught and handled before they escalate.
After publication, the page lives inside a community process that runs continuously. Without monitoring you only find out about a problem when someone points it out — by which point it may already be hard to fix.
Random edits, biased rewrites, or competitive sabotage can land at any time. Most are reverted by the community quickly — some aren't.
An editor can nominate the article for deletion at any point. The discussion window is short — usually 7 days — and missing it costs the page.
Funding rounds, leadership changes, product pivots — facts age. Without scheduled refresh, the article slowly drifts away from current truth.
Multilingual rollouts diverge over time. An update on the English page won't propagate automatically to the German, French or Italian editions.
Pick the cadence that matches your article's exposure profile and your number of language editions. All plans run on a yearly billing cycle.
Baseline monitoring for a single Wikipedia edition with low-to-moderate exposure profile.
Right fit for the majority of multilingual rollouts. Adds active updates and source refresh on top of monitoring.
For broad multilingual presence (Global 7+) and high-exposure profiles where issues need same-week handling.
Feature-by-feature view across all three tiers.
| Feature | Basic | Standard | Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual price | €1,200 | €1,800 | €3,000 |
| Check cadence | Quarterly | Monthly | Weekly |
| Vandalism alerts | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deletion-nomination response | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Minor factual updates | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Source refresh | — | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cross-edition sync | — | — | ✓ |
| Talk-page & discussion monitoring | — | — | ✓ |
| Status report | Quarterly | Monthly | Weekly |
| Best for | Single language | 3–7 editions | 7+ editions, public brands |
Maintenance plans provide monitoring, alerts and structured response. They do not change the fact that Wikipedia is community-run.
If maintenance reveals a structural issue — for example, that the article's source pack has weakened over time — the honest answer may be that the article needs additional source-readiness work, not just monitoring.
Agencies that have delivered Wikipedia pages for multiple clients can consolidate monitoring under a portfolio plan: shared reporting, priority alert handling and volume pricing on the per-page rate.
One monthly portfolio report covering every client page, with red/amber/green status indicators and any actions taken.
Deletion nominations and high-impact incidents on partner-portfolio pages move to the front of the response queue.
Per-page rates adjust by portfolio size. Available to active partner-tier agencies; pricing confirmed on intake.
Stability is the period before the next event. Vandalism, deletion nominations and contested edits arrive without warning. Most pages don't need Premium; most pages do benefit from at least Basic.
Minor factual updates means refreshing already-supported facts when a new reliable source backs them — funding rounds, leadership changes, public milestones. It does not include adding new sections, restructuring the article or adding controversial content; that's a separate scope.
Upgrades take effect immediately and are pro-rated. Downgrades take effect at renewal; we don't refund mid-year on downgrades because the lower-tier work has already been delivered.
We support the deletion-review process and document what triggered the nomination. If the underlying issue is fixable (for example, source-quality weakness), we recommend a path back via the Source Readiness Program.
Vandalism and deletion nominations don't wait. Start with the cadence that matches your exposure and adjust as your portfolio grows.